TB&H Interest Groups' responses to The Council’s proposed 20-year strategic plan for Brighton and Hove

Below are the responses made by TB&H Interest Groups during the public consultation on our Council's strategic plan for our city (through to 2026) which finished on 8th August 2008.
Return to LLG Home Page

Liaison with Local Government Group – response written by Jacqui Cuff

Exec Summary/general - Partly Support

Note: The Transition Brighton and Hove Liaison with Local Government Group (TBH-LLGG) Group has decided that since other sectoral Transition working groups propose putting in their comments separately the LLGG would focus mainly on comments of a strategic and over-arching nature, referring to specifics by way of illustration. This response is also limited by the timetable as TBH-LLGG only have had time to comment on the core strategy and not associated documents such as the sustainability appraisal and its mitigation measures. TBH-LLGG welcomes the core strategy – revised preferred options document in general and as summarised in the executive summary on pages 2/3. In particular it welcomes the reference to "ensuring that new development is delivered in a way which reduces the city's ecological footprint, contributes towards meeting the city's targets for reduction in carbon emissions and are resilient to the predicted local effects of climate change".

However, the revised core strategy is underpinned by a "growing population" and "growing local economy" and requirements of the SE plan. This leads us to be concerned at contradictions within the strategy. We are concerned at this dominant emphasis on growth in the document as a whole and a lack of reference to any more visionary patterns for sustainable development.

There is no little or no recognition of the urgency of the future challenges facing the country, and Brighton & Hove as a city, in terms of the rising prices of non renewables and increasing prices of essentials such as food and fuel. TBH-LLGG does not accept the underlying assumption of never-ending supplies of cheap oil and plentiful food supplies and thereby the assumption of continuing growth in the same way as presently. We would argue that the challenges are so great that we need to consider a new "economics" to take these massive challenges into account , for example we would point to the recent New Economics Foundation publication "A Green New Deal" which we suggest would be useful reading for all elected members and those involved with this consultation process and future revisions to the core strategy.

Cross ref this general concern re growth emphasis to comments on parts one and 2 – especially the drivers for change (para 1.9) and vision (para 1.20)

Contents – pages 4-189 - Partly Support

Whilst it is understandable and in some ways desirable that the document had to be divided into "chunks" – particularly with reference to Development Areas and special areas - the core policy divisions do have the disadvantage of making it more difficult to see the links and overlaps between the various policies , thereby achieving an integrated and holistic approach to policies and contributing to an overall vision. This also allows a degree of contradiction to creep into the document.

Please state the changes you would like to see incorporated into the document or if an alternative option should be considered. Some cross-referencing within the document would be desirable, particularly between core policy areas. A section somewhere within the document bringing the sectors together in an integrated way (perhaps in the vision) would be useful.

See comments below on lack of succinct holistic vision (para 1.20 page 19)

Page 19 para 1.20 - Spatial vision - partly Support

Para 1.20 contains a list of aims based on the characteristics of Brighton and Hove and identified key drivers for change (para 1.9). However, the aims are not prefaced by a succinct and clear spatial vision.

Insert into part one (perhaps as preface to para 1.20) a vision statement for the spatial development of the city in terms of development which – we suggest:

"maintains and enhances the economic, social and environmental well-being of Brighton and Hove".

Reiterate this succinct vision statement in the executive summary.

Cross ref comments below to lack of reference to quality of life and well being issues in the drivers for change ( para 1.9)

Para 1.9 page 11 Drivers for change - partly Support

We very much welcome reference to Brighton's high environmental footprint as being one of the listed drivers for change and to a proposed shift to a "resource efficient future". Equally we welcome reference to moving to a "low carbon economy". However, we urge for more ambitious reduction targets for Brighton and Hove.

Quality of Life

We do not see any reference as a driver for change issues relating to factors affecting quality of life relating to the environment and pressures on its – such as the issue of air quality and pressures of air pollution by car, industrial and domestic emissions and of noise pollution. Other quality of life issues which may be affected by the urban environment – such as adverse effects on mental health and well being - are not mentioned either. This does not tie in well with some of the strategic objectives ( e.g SO 19 mentions seeking improvements in air quality and "healthy urban planning" and "noise pollution"

That the need to maintain and enhance well being and quality of life aspects are referred to in the drivers for change.

That the drivers refer to the LAA current CO2 emission target of 4% per annum for 3 years and also that we would like to see this stretched to ensure an 80% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050 rather than 60% (bear in mind BH high ecological footprint)

Para 1.20 page 19 - Partly Support

We welcome aims relating to moving towards a zero carbon city etc. However, the listed aims within para 1.20 are potentially contradictory and there is a lack of clarity here ( and in the document generally) about where the place and role of aims related to carbon emissions and ecological footprints fit with other aims, for example, "B&H will play its full role in the economic growth and development of the south east region"

There also needs to be more clarity around the aim of "reducing the ecological footprint of the city ahead of the draft South East Plan targets" – how exactly?

More written integration of stated aims to show how they will work together and not in opposition. Insertion of a simple vision.

CP8 – sustainable transport - Partly Support

There are again potential contradictions relating to this policy. We welcome reference to sustainable transport and integrated systems and 3.56 (especially transport assessments for major developments). However, we do not see how much of CP8is compatible with the proposals for transport development within DA3 (Lewes Road) and New England/London Road (DA4). We have particular concerns about the car parking and traffic implications of allowing a major retail store as part of the London Road redevelopment.

CP1- sustainable buildings - Partly Support

This policy has an overemphasis on new build as part of development rather than the option of encouraging imaginative reuse of existing buildings within development proposals. We are concerned (bearing in mind the stated objectives of reducing carbon emissions) at the high levels of embodied carbon and energy used in association with demolishing buildings and erecting replacements.

We would urge that CP1 be amended to include within it a commitment, where possible, to requiring reuse or adaptation of existing buildings to minimise carbon release and emissions (for example recladding buildings within the London Road redevelopment). If CP1 is not the place for such a commitment we ask that this be inserted into the document elsewhere.


CP4 – Healthy City - Partly Support

P 99 - We object to the fact that treatment of the issue of food growing in the urban areas (other than references in SA4 to urban fringe food production) is a little hidden away within this document within this section with reference to the need for access to "healthy food".

There is also a welcome reference to allotments, small scale agriculture and farmers markets and the role they play in "providing access to healthy, affordable locally produced food options"

However, food is a much more strategic issue than this – it relates to enterprise/business, quality of life, open spaces etc. We are particularly concerned that urban food growing is not addressed since we believe this will be an important issue for the future. We would also refer to the old style "Dig for victory" models which are regaining currency as a development model.

Allotments should have a higher profile within CP4 or elsewhere and, whilst we agree that existing ones should be "safeguarded" (p98) we would like to see inserted a further commitment to "encourage and support/promote community allotments " rather than just "safeguard" them.

We also would like to see the potential for food growing in all new developments considered as a planning issue. The potential of Council land for food growing should also be investigated and made a stated commitment – i.e. in open spaces such as parks , land in front of high rise blocks etc. Amendments within this or other sections to reflect the importance of the food growing issue are needed.

Making full use of land for food production could be added as a further spatial objective?

Page 13 – energy - Partly Support

Energy production: Given that the document is structured around segregated core policies we think treatment of energy production (particularly renewables) is inadequate.

We recommend a dedicated chapter (CP) to energy production, stating how the city aims to produce its energy in line with emission reduction goals and a move towards regional renewable energy targets and contributions to "zero decentralised energy production" (p 13)

We would also like more weight given to and reference made to identification of land-based infrastructure for off shore energy generation.


Glossary – P 250-262 - Partly Support

Members of TBH have highlighted concerns over several of the glossary definitions – examples include:

"climate change" (page 252) A more appropiate definition would be: In the context of environmental policy, it refers to long-term changes in modern climate (temperature, precipitation, wind, etc.), regarded as a result human activity, mostly fossil fuel consumption.

- The definition of "ecosystem services" (page 253) says that they are provided by biodiversity. They are provided by the ecosystem, as the name implies, or perhaps a clearer definition, they are provided by the plants, animals and micro-organisms in the area.

- The definition of "ecological footprint" (page 254) doesn't mention that carbon dioxide is included in the calculation of waste, which is fundamental.

- The definition of "low carbon technologies" (page 256) includes fuel cells.
Unfortunately, fuel cells cannot be considered low carbon if the electricity comes from burning fossil fuels, because they use more fossil fuels per unit of work produced than using an internal or external combustion engine powered by fossil fuel derivatives directly. The definition also includes gas fired CHP, but there have been studies suggesting that a well insulated high-efficiency boiler is as efficient in its use of gas as gas fired CHP, so we would propose removing it from the definition as well.

- The definition of "zero carbon technologies" (page 262) says that "zero carbon" is the same as "renewable". However, we consider them to be different. "Zero carbon" means that no carbon dioxide emissions are produced as the result of this technology, in other words, that fossil fuels are not used, and that if biomass is used, it comes from a sustainable source, therefore the source keeps absorbing the same amount of carbon dioxide as it's emitted by using it. "Renewable" means that the energy source is constantly replenished (solar, wind, hydro, etc.). An example of a commonly used technology that is zero carbon but not renewable is nuclear power.


The Transition Brighton & Hove Food Group - Ann Baldridge (Coordinator)

The Transition Brighton & Hove Food Group welcomes the Council’s commitment to ensuring residents have better access to locally produced food (as noted in CP4 and SA4). Climate change and diminishing oil supplies mean that we are going to have to start growing more of our own food, so we are pleased that the council acknowledges and supports this. However, it was unclear in the consultation document whether more land is going to be made available for food production now and in the coming 20 years to feed Brighton & Hove’s growing population. We would be interested to know more about how urban areas will be assessed for their suitability for food production (amongst other possibilities) as noted in 2.141, as we would welcome an increase in land made available for food production within the city.

B&H Transition Energy Group - Jim Adams (Coordinator)

As the coordinator of the Brighton & Hove Transition Energy Group, part of Transition Brighton & Hove, I am writing to you with the Group’s submission on recommendations for incorporation in the Core Strategy.

The Group’s submission covers five areas of the Core Strategy.

(1) That in terms of renewable energy, the document should specifically include the provision of an electricity connection to a substation (which already exists) between offshore wind farm developments and the Shoreham Harbour site.
(2) That the Council will encourage the incorporation of the use of waste heat from the Shoreham Power Station within related future housing developments envisaged in the plan.
(3) Our comments on the Core Strategy document glossary: The document says the glossary is not part of the Preferred Options document. We would like a glossary to be part of any final document for the Core Strategy, and the definitions in it to be checked and factually correct. If words like "sustainable" mean different things to different people, they can be used to justify developments that are not what they claim to be. A more appropriate definition of "climate change" (page 252) would be: In the context of environmental policy, it refers to long-term changes in modern climate (temperature, precipitation, wind, etc.), regarded as a result human activity, mostly fossil fuel consumption.

The definition of "ecosystem services" (page 253) says that they are provided by biodiversity. No, they are provided by the ecosystem, as the name implies, or if you prefer a clearer definition, they are provided by the plants, animals and micro-organisms in the area.

The definition of "ecological footprint" (page 254) doesn't mention that carbon dioxide is included in the calculation of waste, which is fundamental.
The definition of "low carbon technologies" (page 256) includes fuel cells. Unfortunately, fuel cells cannot be considered low carbon if the electricity comes from burning fossil fuels, because they use more fossil fuels per unit of work produced than using an internal or external combustion engine powered by fossil fuel derivatives directly. The definition also includes gas fired CHP, but there have been studies suggesting that a well insulated high-efficiency boiler is as efficient in its use of gas as gas fired CHP, so we would propose removing it from the definition as well.

The definition of "zero carbon technologies" (page 262) says that "zero carbon" is the same as "renewable". However, they are different. "Zero carbon" means that no carbon dioxide emissions are produced as the result of this technology, in other words, that fossil fuels are not used, and that if biomass is used, it comes from a sustainable source, therefore the source keeps absorbing the same amount of carbon dioxide as it's emitted by using it. "Renewable" means that the energy source is constantly replenished (solar, wind, hydro, etc.). There is one commonly used technology that is zero carbon but not renewable, namely nuclear power.

(4) That the document states the council adheres to the Nottingham Declaration on Climate Change.
(5) That the section on the Marina states that the Council will support including a solar array at the Marina Car Park.


For each TB&H Interest & Neighbourhood Group relevant sections of The Core Strategy are indexed below

INTEREST GROUPS

A) Buildings and construction - Moderator Nicola Thomas

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

SN2 - Residential Renewal Areas-----Funding measures (employment, leisure, open space) to reduce inequalities between disadvantaged areas and the rest of the city.

Part Three - Core Policies-----The Council's preferred approach to strategic policy issues such as housing, transport and shopping.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP9 Developer Contributions-----all new development to be accompanied by the necessary provision of social and physical infrastructure.

CP10 Managing Flood Risk-----avoidance or mitigation of flooding events such as surface/muddy floods, groundwater, or sewer floods.

CP11 Housing Delivery-----accordance with the target set in the draft South East Plan of 570 new homes annually to 2026.

CP12 Affordable Housing-----an annual (average) target of 230 units of affordable units of accommodation over the plan period.

CP13 Housing Densities-----density should be appropriate to the identified positive character of the neighbourhood; otherwise, strict conditions.


B) Business and economics - Moderator Martin Grimshaw

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.

CP16 Strategic employment sites-----list of sites and premises which will be safeguarded and promoted for industrial and business use to meet 2026 employment needs.

CP17 Other employment sites-----maintaining the portfolio of smaller business premises, workshops, units for start-up firms.

CP18 Culture, Tourism and Heritage-----maintain and enhance historic environment and culture; support the role of the arts, creative industries and tourism sector.

CP19 Hotel/Guest Accommodation-----provision of a sufficient and wide ranging type and cost of accommodation to cater for visitors; proposals for new hotel facilities


C) Energy - Moderators Jim Adams (Matthew Bird, Doly Garcia)


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

DA2 - Brighton Marina and Black Rock-----envisaged as an area which can take a lot of new development.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP8 Sustainable Transport-----create integrated sustainable transport system: environmental benefits by promoting walking, cycling and public transport use.


D) Food - Moderator Ann Baldridge


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SA4 - Urban Fringe-----development proposals to meet conditions which have regard to green network and proximity of countryside.

SA5 - South Downs-----Council to work in partnership with the National Park Authority to protect and enhance the natural beauty.

CP5 Biodiversity-----Promoting the establishment of a green network of nature conservation features; linking and repairing existing habitats.

CP6 Open Space-----safeguard, enhance, promote access & active living, and where possible add to B & H's green open spaces and beaches.

CP13 Housing Densities-----density should be appropriate to the identified positive character of the neighbourhood; otherwise, strict conditions.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


E) Health - Moderator John Kapp


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SA5 - South Downs-----Council to work in partnership with the National Park Authority to protect and enhance the natural beauty.

CP4 Healthy City-----Health Impact Assessments on all strategic developments; safeguard role of allotments/small scale agriculture/farmers'markets.

CP5 Biodiversity-----Promoting the establishment of a green network of nature conservation features; linking and repairing existing habitats.

CP6 Open Space-----safeguard, enhance, promote access & active living, and where possible add to B & H's green open spaces and beaches.

CP7 Sports and Recreation-----create a Sporting City: support delivery of proposed Falmer/Black Rock/King Alfred sporting facilities.

CP8 Sustainable Transport-----create integrated sustainable transport system: environmental benefits by promoting walking, cycling and public transport use.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


F Heart and Soul - Moderator Jo Nean

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

CP4 Healthy City-----Health Impact Assessments on all strategic developments; safeguard role of allotments/small scale agriculture/farmers'markets.

CP14 Gypsies and Travellers-----accordance with the requirements of The South East Plan; suitability criteria for new sites.


G) Textiles and clothing - Moderator Kat Neeser

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.

H) Transport - Moderators Doly Garcia, Graham Towers,

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

DA2 - Brighton Marina and Black Rock-----envisaged as an area which can take a lot of new development.

CP8 Sustainable Transport-----create integrated sustainable transport system: environmental benefits by promoting walking, cycling and public transport use.

I) Waste and recycling - Moderator Jessica Gwynne

Please note that Waste and Minerals issues will be dealt with in the Waste and Minerals development Framework (WDMF) which is being prepared with East Sussex County Council. The WDMF is being prepared in parallel with the Local Development Framework (LDF). Clearly, aspects of the LDF (which contains The Core Strategy) will impact on this sister document.

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


NEIGHBOURHOOD GROUPS


J) Goldsmid - Moderator David Greenop


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


K) Hanover & Queens Park - Moderator Charley


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


L) Roundhill / Triangle - Moderators Jo,


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

DA3 - Lewes Road-----described as an area with mixed and often poor quality townscape and public realm. Seen as the academic corridor.

DA4 - New England Quarter and London Road-----a major new business quarter: 20,000 sq m of office floorspace needed by 2016


SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


M) Shoreham - Moderator Moyra Martin


Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

DA7 - Shoreham Harbour and South Portslade-----major new regeneration: creation of a highly sustainable neighbourhood; flood protection.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


N) West Hove- Moderator Liz Wakefield

Contents

Executive Summary -----Provision of 8,000 new jobs over next 10 years and 11,000 new homes by 2026 on the basis of estimated population of 295,700.

Introduction and how to comment-----Description of the planning documents to be contained in the new Local Development Framework. How to comment.

Part One - Content, Vision and Objectives-----The main characteristics of Brighton and Hove as a city; the main drivers for change. 21 spatial objectives.

Part Two - Spatial Strategy-----Broad guidelines for deciding where development in the city will go.

The revised Spatial Strategy-----Minimum amount of development (2006-2026) by type and Development Area in the city where it is recommended to go.

DA6 - Hove Station Area-----make use of under-used land and buildings; 295 additional residential units; maintain office floorspace.

SN1- Sustainable Neighbourhoods-----Create balance communities and reduce dependence on private car in primarily residential neighbourhoods.

CP1 Sustainable Buildings-----B & H ranked 57th out of 60 cities featured in an ecological footprinting study (3.47 planets or 6.25 global hectares per person).

CP2 Urban Design-----The plan is to increase density, allowing high-rise developments in 9 areas of the city.

CP3 Public Streets and Spaces-----to improve the quality, legibility and accessibility: new development/transport/regeneration schemes.

CP15 Retail Provision-----to maintain the city's current hierarchy of shopping centres (these are listed), encouraging a range of facilities and uses.


THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION WHICH FINISHED ON 8 AUGUST 2008

The council's 6-week consultation provided the public (including Transition Brighton and Hove) with an opportunity to give their views on the content of the Revised 'Core Strategy Preferred Options' document. The aim now is to create a final version for submission to government in May 2009.

The revised 'Core Strategy Preferred Options' document is published together with:

A Quick Reference Guide to the Core Strategy
Supporting Evidence Document
Revised Sustainability Appraisal Report and
Non-Technical Summary
A range of Background Studies
A Statement of Consultation (summarises responses received on the 2006 version)

All of the above documents are available to view and download at the council's web site at: www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/ldf.